What if the cheque was given as security and not for a debt?

Section 138 applies where the cheque was issued for the discharge of a legally enforceable debt or other liability. Section 139 presumes that it was, so a drawer asserting that the cheque was purely a security instrument with no subsisting liability must place material on record to rebut that presumption. Outcomes are fact-specific and depend heavily on the documentary record of the underlying transaction.

Can a cheque be presented again after it bounces?

A cheque may be presented again within its validity period, and the statutory timelines run from the dishonour on which the demand notice is based. However, the cause of action arises on failure to pay after a valid notice, so repeated presentation and repeated notices can create confusion about which dishonour the complaint rests on. The sequence should be documented carefully.

Is a cheque bounce case civil or criminal?

A Section 138 proceeding is criminal in form and is tried by a Magistrate, although it arises out of a commercial debt. A separate civil suit for recovery of the amount may also be maintainable. The two run independently, with different procedures, different standards and different limitation periods.

Criminal

How does Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act work?

Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 makes it an offence where a cheque issued to discharge a legally enforceable debt or liability is returned unpaid for insufficiency of funds or because it exceeds the arranged amount. The payee must issue a demand notice within thirty days of receiving information of dishonour. The drawer then has fifteen days to pay. If payment is not made, a complaint must be filed within one month of the expiry of that period.

Consult on a cheque matter All legal questions

Key takeaways

The cheque must have been issued for a legally enforceable debt or liability.
Demand notice: within 30 days of information of dishonour from the bank.
Drawer’s payment window: 15 days from receipt of the notice.
Complaint: within one month of the expiry of the 15-day window.
Missing a timeline can extinguish the criminal remedy even where the debt is genuine.

Relevant law and authority

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138: Creates the offence of dishonour of cheque for insufficiency of funds.
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 139: Presumption that the cheque was issued for discharge of a debt or liability.
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 142: Cognizance of offences and the limitation for filing the complaint.
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: Governs procedure before the Magistrate.

The statutory sequence

First, the cheque must be presented within its validity period and returned unpaid for insufficiency of funds or because it exceeds the arrangement. The bank’s return memo is the trigger document.

Second, the payee must issue a written demand notice to the drawer within thirty days of receiving information of the dishonour, demanding payment of the cheque amount.

Third, the drawer has fifteen days from receipt of the notice to make payment. If payment is made, no offence is made out. If it is not, a complaint must be filed within one month of the expiry of that fifteen-day period.

The statutory presumption

Section 139 of the Act raises a presumption that the holder received the cheque for the discharge of a debt or liability. The burden then shifts to the drawer to rebut that presumption on the standard of preponderance of probabilities.

This is why the underlying transaction record matters on both sides. The complainant benefits from the presumption but must still establish the debt if it is credibly disputed, and the drawer must place material on record rather than simply denying liability.

Civil and criminal remedies run separately

A Section 138 complaint is a criminal proceeding. A separate civil claim for recovery of the amount may also be available, and the limitation period for that claim runs under the Limitation Act, 1963 independently of the criminal timelines.

Missing the Section 138 timelines does not necessarily destroy the civil claim, but it does remove a remedy that in practice is often the more effective route to payment.

Practical implications

Keep the original cheque and the bank return memo — both are essential.
Send the demand notice by a mode that proves service, and keep the acknowledgement.
Diarise all three deadlines the day the return memo is received.
Preserve the underlying invoice, ledger or agreement evidencing the debt.
If you are the drawer, respond to the notice within fifteen days rather than after.

Common questions

What if the cheque was given as security and not for a debt?: Section 138 applies where the cheque was issued for the discharge of a legally enforceable debt or other liability. Section 139 presumes that it was, so a drawer asserting that the cheque was purely a security instrument with no subsisting liability must place material on record to rebut that presumption. Outcomes are fact-specific and depend heavily on the documentary record of the underlying transaction.
Can a cheque be presented again after it bounces?: A cheque may be presented again within its validity period, and the statutory timelines run from the dishonour on which the demand notice is based. However, the cause of action arises on failure to pay after a valid notice, so repeated presentation and repeated notices can create confusion about which dishonour the complaint rests on. The sequence should be documented carefully.
Is a cheque bounce case civil or criminal?: A Section 138 proceeding is criminal in form and is tried by a Magistrate, although it arises out of a commercial debt. A separate civil suit for recovery of the amount may also be maintainable. The two run independently, with different procedures, different standards and different limitation periods.

Sources & editorial information

Jurisdiction: India
Last reviewed: 17 September 2026
Legal status: Current

Primary sources

This page is general legal information about Indian law, prepared against identified legal sources. It is not legal advice and does not create a lawyer–client relationship. Apply it to your own facts only after a consultation with a qualified legal professional.

Dealing with a dishonoured cheque?

The Section 138 timelines are strict. Organise the documents and work through the notice and filing sequence before a deadline passes.

Consult on a cheque matter Start a consultation